🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim endured losing against lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and appears to have failed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – simply operate at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Supreme Power Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then bin them for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.