🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.